Impact of Extremism on Pakistani Society and Armed forces

Abstract

This research paper examines the complex and multifaceted impact of extremism on Pakistan’s society and military establishment. Since its inception in 1947, Pakistan has experienced various forms of extremism, ranging from sectarian violence to militant insurgencies, which have significantly shaped its sociopolitical landscape. This study analyzes the historical evolution of extremism in Pakistan, its socioeconomic consequences, effects on civil-military relations, and the military’s response strategies. The research identifies that extremism has not only resulted in significant human and economic losses but has also altered the fabric of Pakistani society and transformed the role of its armed forces. The findings suggest that a comprehensive counter-extremism approach, focusing on both security and social dimensions, is essential for addressing the challenges posed by extremism in Pakistan.

Keywords: Extremism, Pakistan, Military, Counter-terrorism, Radicalization, Security

Introduction

Pakistan has grappled with the complex challenge of extremism since its early years as an independent nation. The problem has evolved significantly over the decades, influenced by domestic socio-political factors, regional geopolitics, and global trends. Extremism in Pakistan manifests in various forms, including sectarian violence, militant insurgencies, and religious fundamentalism, each with distinct but interconnected impacts on society and state institutions. The military, as Pakistan’s most powerful institution, has been both affected by and responded to these challenges in ways that have profoundly shaped the country’s trajectory.

This research paper aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of how extremism has impacted Pakistani society and its military apparatus. It explores the historical context of extremism in Pakistan, analyzes its multidimensional effects on society, examines the challenges posed to the military, evaluates the military’s response strategies, and discusses the implications for Pakistan’s future. By understanding these dynamics, this study contributes to the broader discourse on countering extremism and promoting stability in complex security environments.

The significance of this research lies in its attempt to provide a holistic view of extremism’s impact beyond security concerns alone. While much scholarly attention has focused on the operational aspects of countering extremism, this paper emphasizes the interconnectedness of security, social, economic, and political dimensions of the challenge. This approach is essential for developing comprehensive strategies that address not only the symptoms but also the root causes of extremism in Pakistan.

Historical Context and Evolution of Extremism in Pakistan

 Early Manifestations (1947-1970s)

Pakistan’s creation in 1947 as a homeland for South Asian Muslims established religion as a central element of national identity. However, the early leadership, particularly under Muhammad Ali Jinnah, envisioned a moderate and pluralistic state. The period immediately following independence saw limited extremism, primarily manifested in communal violence during partition (Talbot, 2012).

The seeds of religious extremism began to take root during the 1970s. The loss of East Pakistan (now Bangladesh) in 1971 prompted a crisis of national identity, leading to increased emphasis on Islamic identity under Prime Minister Zulfikar Ali Bhutto. This trend accelerated significantly during General Zia-ul-Haq’s military rule (1977-1988), which saw sweeping Islamization policies that transformed Pakistan’s legal, educational, and social institutions (Haqqani, 2005).

 The Afghan Jihad and Its Aftermath (1980s-1990s)

The Soviet invasion of Afghanistan in 1979 marked a turning point in the evolution of extremism in Pakistan. With support from the United States and Saudi Arabia, Pakistan’s military intelligence agency, the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI), facilitated the Afghan resistance against Soviet forces. This period saw the establishment of thousands of madrassas (religious schools) along the Pakistan-Afghanistan border, many of which became breeding grounds for militant ideologies (Abbas, 2005).

The infrastructure created for the Afghan jihad—training camps, weapons supply networks, and ideological frameworks—remained intact after the Soviet withdrawal in 1989. The subsequent civil war in Afghanistan and the rise of the Taliban influenced Pakistan’s internal dynamics, with many returning jihadists bringing their militancy home. Sectarian violence escalated during the 1990s, with groups like Sipah-e-Sahaba Pakistan (SSP) and Lashkar-e-Jhangvi (LeJ) targeting Shia communities, while groups like Tehrik-e-Jafria emerged in response (Fair, 2014).

Post-9/11 Era and the War on Terror (2001-Present)

The terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, and Pakistan’s subsequent alliance with the United States in the “War on Terror” dramatically altered the extremism landscape. President Pervez Musharraf’s decision to support the U.S.-led coalition against the Taliban regime in Afghanistan created domestic backlash, particularly in the tribal areas bordering Afghanistan.

The formation of the Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) in 2007 marked a significant escalation, as militant groups previously focused on external conflicts now directly challenged the Pakistani state. Between 2007 and 2014, Pakistan experienced an unprecedented wave of terrorist attacks targeting civilians, government institutions, and military installations (Javaid, 2011).

While military operations like Zarb-e-Azb (2014) and Radd-ul-Fasaad (2017) significantly reduced terrorist incidents, extremism continues to manifest in various forms. The rise of the Islamic State (ISIS) has introduced new dimensions to the challenge, while social media has created new avenues for radicalization (Shah & Butt, 2019).

Socioeconomic Impact of Extremism on Pakistani Society

 Human and Economic Costs

The direct human cost of extremism in Pakistan has been staggering. According to the Pakistan Institute for Peace Studies, between 2001 and 2020, terrorist attacks claimed over 70,000 lives, including civilians, security personnel, and militants (PIPS, 2021). Beyond fatalities, countless others have suffered physical injuries, psychological trauma, and displacement.

The economic impact has been equally severe. The government of Pakistan estimated that the direct and indirect economic costs of terrorism between 2001 and 2018 exceeded $126 billion (Ministry of Finance, 2018). This includes damage to infrastructure, reduced foreign investment, declining tourism, increased security expenditures, and lost productivity. Key industries such as textiles in Punjab and tourism in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and Gilgit-Baltistan have been particularly affected (Khan, 2016).

3.2 Social Fabric and Community Relations

Extremism has significantly altered Pakistan’s social fabric. Sectarian violence has deepened divisions between Sunni and Shia communities, while minority groups like Christians, Hindus, and Ahmadis have faced increased persecution. The 2014 attack on the Army Public School in Peshawar, which killed 149 people, mostly children, represented a traumatic national experience that highlighted the threat to basic social institutions (Afzal, 2018).

Trust between communities has eroded in areas heavily affected by extremism. In parts of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and the former Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA), traditional social structures have been undermined by militant groups that established parallel governance systems. The displacement of over 5 million people due to military operations against extremists has further disrupted communities and created new social challenges (Khan & Zheng, 2020).

Education and Cultural Impact

Education has been specifically targeted by extremist groups, with thousands of schools destroyed, particularly girls’ schools. The Taliban’s opposition to female education, exemplified by the 2012 attack on education activist Malala Yousafzai, has hampered educational development in affected regions (Naqvi et al., 2018).

The cultural landscape has also been transformed. Music, arts, and cultural expressions deemed “un-Islamic” by extremist groups have faced restrictions in certain areas. In regions like Swat, once known for its vibrant cultural traditions, extremist control temporarily silenced cultural activities. Even after military operations restored government control, the fear of extremist retribution continues to impact cultural expression (Ali, 2018).

The Pakistan Army: Challenges and Responses

 Evolving Security Challenges

The Pakistan Army, traditionally focused on the external threat from India, has had to rapidly adapt to counter internal security challenges posed by extremist groups. This adaptation has required significant changes in doctrine, training, equipment, and force structure (Fair, 2014).

The geographic spread of extremism has presented particular challenges. Operations in mountainous terrain along the Afghanistan border require different tactics than urban counter-terrorism operations in cities like Karachi or Lahore. The enemy’s asymmetric tactics, including suicide bombings, improvised explosive devices (IEDs), and ambushes, have inflicted significant casualties on security forces (Javaid & Hashmi, 2012).

Intelligence challenges have been equally daunting. Extremist groups often blend into civilian populations, making identification difficult. Networks based on tribal, familial, or ideological connections are resilient and adaptable. The challenge of distinguishing between various militant groups with different objectives and relationships to the state has complicated the military’s response (Yusuf, 2014).

 Military Operations and Counter-Terrorism Strategy

The military’s response to extremism has evolved through several phases. Early operations (2002-2008) in the tribal areas were limited in scope and often resulted in temporary peace agreements. The Taliban insurgency in Swat Valley prompted Operation Rah-e-Rast in 2009, marking a more comprehensive approach. Operation Zarb-e-Azb, launched in 2014 after the breakdown of peace talks with the TTP, represented a decisive shift toward full-scale military operations (Akhtar, 2017).

Current counter-terrorism strategy under Operation Radd-ul-Fasaad emphasizes intelligence-based operations (IBOs), border management, and a “whole-of-nation approach” that coordinates military action with civilian law enforcement and governance initiatives. The establishment of military courts for terrorism cases and the National Action Plan following the 2014 Peshawar school attack represented attempts to create a comprehensive response framework (Yaseen & Muzaffar, 2018).

Civil-Military Relations and Institutional Changes

The army’s central role in countering extremism has reinforced its dominant position in Pakistan’s political system. While civilian governments officially direct counter-terrorism policy, the military maintains significant autonomy in security operations and shapes the national security narrative (Shah, 2014).

The army has undergone institutional adaptation to meet the challenges of extremism. This includes the creation of specialized counter-terrorism units, enhanced training for asymmetric warfare, and improved intelligence capabilities. The military has also invested in rehabilitation programs for former militants and developed civil-military cooperation mechanisms for areas cleared of extremists (Siddiqa, 2017).

Ideological Dimensions and Narrative Battles

 Competing Narratives and Ideological Challenges

Pakistan faces complex ideological challenges in countering extremism. The narrative that jihad against perceived enemies of Islam is religiously sanctioned has been difficult to counter, particularly given the state’s historical support for certain militant groups and the religious rhetoric used during the Afghan jihad (Fair, 2015).

The military has attempted to develop counter-narratives emphasizing that extremist interpretations contradict Islamic teachings and that terrorism harms Pakistan’s national interests. However, these efforts compete with well-established radical narratives propagated through madrassas, social media, and community networks (Azam & Iqbal, 2017).

 Religious Institutions and Extremism

Religious institutions in Pakistan have complex relationships with extremism. While some madrassas have served as recruitment centers for militant groups, others have opposed violence. The state has attempted to regulate madrassas through registration requirements and curriculum reforms, but implementation has been inconsistent (Ahmad, 2015).

The influence of Wahhabism and other conservative interpretations of Islam, supported by funding from Gulf states, has contributed to religious polarization. Religious political parties, though rarely successful electorally, exert significant influence on public discourse regarding religion, law, and social practices (Iqbal & De Silva, 2013).

Regional Dynamics and External Influences

The Afghanistan Factor

The withdrawal of U.S. forces and the Taliban’s return to power in 2021 created new uncertainties. While Pakistan officially welcomed Afghan stability, concerns remain about spillover effects, including possible reinvigoration of the TTP and other groups operating in the Pakistan-Afghanistan border region (Sajjad, 2021).

Cross-border movement of militants, shared ethnic ties between border communities, and the flow of weapons and narcotics all contribute to regional security challenges. Pakistan’s construction of border fencing and enhanced surveillance represent attempts to manage these challenges (Hussain, 2020).

 International Relations and Counter-Terrorism Cooperation

Pakistan’s counter-extremism efforts have been significantly shaped by international relationships. The U.S.-Pakistan partnership in counter-terrorism has been marked by cooperation but also by mutual suspicion and divergent priorities. American drone strikes in Pakistan’s tribal areas, while eliminating high-value targets, have generated controversy and occasional diplomatic tensions (Kronstadt, 2015).

China has become Pakistan’s most important strategic partner, including in security matters. The China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) has elevated Chinese concerns about extremism affecting its investments, leading to increased security cooperation. Pakistan also participates in regional counter-terrorism mechanisms through organizations like the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) (Small, 2015).

Future Trajectories and Policy Implications

 Evolving Nature of the Threat

The threat of extremism in Pakistan continues to evolve. While conventional terrorist attacks have declined, new challenges include the growing influence of transnational groups like ISIS, the use of social media for radicalization, and the potential for extremist influence in mainstream politics and society (Basit, 2020).

Technological advancements create both challenges and opportunities. Extremist groups increasingly use encrypted communications and cyber capabilities, while security forces employ advanced surveillance and data analytics. The battle between extremist networks and state security apparatus increasingly takes place in the digital domain (Khan, 2019).

Comprehensive Approaches to Countering Extremism

Research indicates that effective counter-extremism requires addressing root causes alongside security measures. Pakistan’s National Counter Terrorism Authority (NACTA) has developed frameworks for preventing violent extremism that emphasize education, economic development, and social cohesion, though implementation remains inconsistent (Raza, 2019).

Civil society organizations play crucial roles in promoting tolerance, supporting victims of terrorism, and countering extremist narratives at the community level. Examples include the Pakistan Peace Collective, which implements counter-narrative campaigns, and organizations supporting education in conflict-affected areas (Ali & Bukhari, 2018).

 Governance Challenges and Reform Needs

Governance deficits contribute significantly to extremism. Areas with limited state presence, weak rule of law, and inadequate service delivery create environments where extremist groups can establish influence. The integration of former FATA into Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province represents an attempt to address governance gaps, though implementation faces challenges (Yusuf & Yusuf, 2017).

Judicial reform remains critical. Pakistan’s overburdened court system struggles to effectively prosecute terrorism cases, leading to low conviction rates. Police forces require modernization, better training, and resources to function as effective counter-terrorism partners with the military (Abbas, 2011).

Conclusion

Extremism has profoundly shaped contemporary Pakistan, affecting its society, military, politics, and international relations. The impacts range from direct human and economic costs to more subtle transformations in social dynamics, institutional relationships, and national identity.

The Pakistan Army has evolved significantly in response to extremism, developing new capabilities and approaches while maintaining its dominant role in national security affairs. However, military operations alone cannot address the complex challenges posed by extremism, which require comprehensive approaches addressing ideological, social, economic, and governance dimensions.

Pakistan’s experience offers important lessons for understanding and countering extremism in complex societies. It demonstrates that extremism thrives in environments characterized by ideological contestation, governance deficits, regional instability, and socioeconomic challenges. Addressing these factors requires sustained commitment across multiple policy domains and involvement from diverse stakeholders.

As Pakistan moves forward, balancing security imperatives with political rights, navigating regional complexities, and addressing underlying societal divisions will remain critical challenges. The country’s success in managing these challenges will significantly influence not only its own stability and development but also regional security dynamics.

References

Abbas, H. (2005). Pakistan’s Drift into Extremism: Allah, the Army, and America’s War on Terror. M.E. Sharpe.

Abbas, H. (2011). Reforming Pakistan’s Police and Law Enforcement Infrastructure. United States Institute of Peace Special Report, 266, 1-16.

Afzal, M. (2018). Pakistan Under Siege: Extremism, Society, and the State. Brookings Institution Press.

Ahmad, I. (2015). The Role of Madrassas in Pakistan. Journal of International Relations and Sustainable Development, 3(2), 54-72.

Akhtar, N. (2017). Pakistan’s Counter-terrorism Strategy (2001-2014): An Analysis. Strategic Studies, 37(2), 178-203.

Ali, A. (2018). Cultural Transformation in Swat Valley: Impact of Militancy and Military Operation. Journal of Political Studies, 25(1), 65-79.

Ali, S., & Bukhari, S. (2018). Civil Society’s Role in Countering Violent Extremism in Pakistan. Peace Review, 30(2), 238-245.

Azam, Z., & Iqbal, K. (2017). Narrative Contest: Analysis of Taliban and the State Narrative in Pakistan. IPRI Journal, 17(1), 129-163.

Basit, A. (2020). Terrorizing the CPEC: Managing Transnational Militancy in China-Pakistan Relations. Pacific Review, 33(1), 94-124.

Fair, C. C. (2014). Fighting to the End: The Pakistan Army’s Way of War. Oxford University Press.

Fair, C. C. (2015). Explaining Support for Sectarian Terrorism in Pakistan: Piety, Maslak and Sharia. Religions, 6(4), 1137-1167.

Haqqani, H. (2005). Pakistan: Between Mosque and Military. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

Hussain, Z. (2020). The China-Pakistan Economic Corridor and the New Regional Geopolitics. Asie Visions, No. 94, Ifri.

Iqbal, K., & De Silva, S. (2013). Terrorist Lifecycles: A Case Study of Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan. Journal of Policing, Intelligence and Counter Terrorism, 8(1), 72-86.

Javaid, U. (2011). Operation Rah-e-Nijat: A Successful Military Operation Against Terrorists. Journal of Political Studies, 18(1), 113-130.

Javaid, U., & Hashmi, R. S. (2012). Contending Religious Identities: The Issue of “Forced” Conversion in Pakistan. Journal of Political Studies, 19(1), 97-117.

Khan, A. (2016). Economic Losses of Pakistan from War on Terror. Journal of Applied Environmental and Biological Sciences, 6(3), 104-109.

Khan, M. K. (2019). The Pakistan Army’s Adaptation to Hybrid Warfare. Strategic Studies, 39(1), 58-76.

Khan, Z., & Zheng, Y. (2020). Conflict Escalation in Pakistan-India Relations: A Study of Crises Management. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 33(4), 553-575.

Kronstadt, K. A. (2015). Pakistan-U.S. Relations: Issues for the 114th Congress. Congressional Research Service.

Ministry of Finance. (2018). Economic Survey of Pakistan 2017-18. Government of Pakistan.

Naqvi, A. A., Khan, S. Z., & Ahmad, Z. (2018). Impacts of Terrorism on Education in Pakistan. Journal of Education and Educational Development, 5(1), 113-128.

Pakistan Institute for Peace Studies (PIPS). (2021). Pakistan Security Report 2020. PIPS.

Raza, S. S. (2019). Countering Violent Extremism in Pakistan: Local Actions, Local Voices. United States Institute of Peace.

Sajjad, F. (2021). Taliban Takeover in Afghanistan: Implications for Pakistan. Policy Perspectives, 18(2), 73-96.

Shah, A. (2014). The Army and Democracy: Military Politics in Pakistan. Harvard University Press.

Shah, S. A. A., & Butt, K. M. (2019). The Rise of Islamic State in South Asia: Challenges for Pakistan. Journal of Security and Strategic Analyses, 5(1), 1-20.

Siddiqa, A. (2017). Military Inc.: Inside Pakistan’s Military Economy. Pluto Press.

Small, A. (2015). The China-Pakistan Axis: Asia’s New Geopolitics. Oxford University Press.

Talbot, I. (2012). Pakistan: A New History. Columbia University Press.

Yaseen, Z., & Muzaffar, M. (2018). Role of Pakistan’s Armed Forces in the Campaign Against Militancy. Pakistan Journal of Social Sciences, 38(1), 239-252.

Yusuf, H., & Yusuf, S. (2017). Pakistan’s Governance Challenges in FATA. United States Institute of Peace.

For Latest Articles join our WhatsApp Channel

https://whatsapp.com/channel/0029Vb5y4EqInlqKkZGCI630